<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ask-mark.com/2005/10/07/google-reader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ask-mark.com/2005/10/07/google-reader/</link>
	<description>go ahead, ask me anything!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Reader changes at ask-mark.com</title>
		<link>http://ask-mark.com/2005/10/07/google-reader/#comment-7350</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Reader changes at ask-mark.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ask-mark.com/2005/10/07/google-reader/#comment-7350</guid>
		<description>[...] When I first used Google Reader, I thought it was great that there was finally a web-based RSS reader. Unfortunately, I soon found that this was one thing that Google Labs made that I really didn&#8217;t like. Some layout choices, as well as some overdone AJAX just did not sit well with me. I felt like the simple RSS scroller that came with Desktop Sidebar was a much easier to use aggregator. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When I first used Google Reader, I thought it was great that there was finally a web-based RSS reader. Unfortunately, I soon found that this was one thing that Google Labs made that I really didn&#8217;t like. Some layout choices, as well as some overdone AJAX just did not sit well with me. I felt like the simple RSS scroller that came with Desktop Sidebar was a much easier to use aggregator. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
